BMW Z3 2000 vs BMW Z3 2000
Body: | Coupe | Cabrio | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 231 HP | 231 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
BMW Z3 2000 and BMW Z3 2000 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 10.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
By specification BMW Z3 2000 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z3 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW Z3 2000 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW Z3 2000 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z3 2000. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 51 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
670 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
450 km with real consumption | 450 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 460'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 7 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.02 m | 4.05 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.31 m | 1.29 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. BMW Z3 2000 is 3 cm shorter than the BMW Z3 2000, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW Z3 2000 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`575 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | high | |
Average price (€): | 11 600 | 7600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
BMW Z3 has
| |