BMW Z3 1998 vs Alfa Romeo GTV 2002

 
BMW Z3
1998 - 2000
Alfa Romeo GTV
2002 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 193 HP150 HP
Torque: 280 NM181 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.8 seconds8.5 seconds
BMW Z3 is more dynamic to drive.
BMW Z3 engine produces 43 HP more power than Alfa Romeo GTV, whereas torque is 99 NM more than Alfa Romeo GTV. Thanks to more power BMW Z3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.49.2
Real fuel consumption: 10.2 l/100km8.8 l/100km
The Alfa Romeo GTV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW Z3 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo GTV, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW Z3 could require 30 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW Z3 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo GTV.
Fuel tank capacity: 51 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 540 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
680 km on highway1020 km on highway
500 km with real consumption790 km with real consumption
Alfa Romeo GTV gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Alfa Romeo GTV) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW Z3) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW Z3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years10 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērijaInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 156, Alfa Romeo 166, Alfa Romeo 147, Alfa Romeo Spider
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Alfa Romeo GTV might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.02 m4.28 m
Width: 1.74 m1.78 m
Height: 1.31 m1.32 m
BMW Z3 is smaller.
BMW Z3 is 26 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo GTV, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z3 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 210 litres110 litres
BMW Z3 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, BMW Z3 has 100 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo GTV. The Alfa Romeo GTV may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the BMW Z3 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo GTV, which means BMW Z3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5701`780
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 11 60010 600
Pros and Cons: BMW Z3 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Alfa Romeo GTV has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv