BMW Z3 1996 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 3.0 | 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 231 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 168 - 300 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 - 10.5 seconds | 8.5 - 8.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 - 10.6 | 11.7 - 12.4 | |
|
BMW Z3 petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.30 m | |
|
BMW Z3 is smaller. BMW Z3 is 87 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 15 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z3 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 165 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW Z3 is 1.6 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means BMW Z3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`501 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z3 has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |