BMW Z3 1996 vs BMW 3 series 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 231 HP | 143 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 168 - 300 NM | 200 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 - 10.5 seconds | 6.9 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 - 10.6 | 7.7 - 10.0 | |
|
BMW Z3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.37 m | |
|
BMW Z3 is smaller. BMW Z3 is 45 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 3 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z3 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 165 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 300 litres | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. BMW Z3 has 135 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`501 kg | ~ 1`949 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`257 kg | ~ 1`623 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 244 kg | ~ 326 kg | |
| BMW Z3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 34 procentiem less than BMW 3 series. Therefore, BMW 3 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z3 has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |