BMW Z3 1998 vs Seat Cordoba 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW Z3 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Seat Cordoba is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| BMW Z3 is available with rear wheel drive, while Seat Cordoba can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.8 - 3.2 (petrol) | 1.6 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 - 321 HP | 100 - 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 - 350 NM | 145 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 7.1 seconds | 7.9 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 10.4 | 4.8 - 7.8 | |
|
BMW Z3 petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Cordoba. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.42 m | |
| BMW Z3 is 14 cm shorter than the Seat Cordoba, 10 cm wider, while the height of BMW Z3 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
410 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW Z3 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Seat Cordoba, which means BMW Z3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`590 | ~ 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z3 has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |