BMW Z3 1998 vs Ford Puma 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW Z3 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Ford Puma is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| BMW Z3 is available with rear wheel drive, while Ford Puma can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.8 - 3.2 | 1.4 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 - 321 HP | 90 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 - 350 NM | 122 - 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 7.1 seconds | 9.2 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 10.4 | 7.2 - 7.4 | |
|
BMW Z3 petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Puma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.34 m | |
|
BMW Z3 is larger, but slightly lower. BMW Z3 is 4 cm longer than the Ford Puma, 7 cm wider, while the height of BMW Z3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
410 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`590 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z3 has
|
Ford Puma has
| |