BMW Z3 1998 vs BMW Z4 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW Z3
1998 - 2003
BMW Z4
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.8 - 3.23.0 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 193 - 321 HP265 - 343 HP
Torque: 280 - 350 NM315 - 365 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.4 - 7.1 seconds5 - 6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.4 - 10.48.6 - 12.1
BMW Z3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW Z4.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.02 m4.10 m
Width: 1.74 m1.78 m
Height: 1.31 m1.28 m
BMW Z3 is smaller, but slightly higher.
BMW Z3 is 8 cm shorter than the BMW Z4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW Z3 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 210 litres285 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
410 litres340 litres
BMW Z3 has 75 litres less trunk space than the BMW Z4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW Z3 (by 70 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the BMW Z3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW Z4, which means BMW Z3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`590~ 1`690
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 11 60014 400
Pros and Cons: BMW Z3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW Z4 has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv