BMW Z3 1998 vs BMW Z3 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Cabrio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.8 - 3.2 | 1.8 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 - 321 HP | 115 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 - 350 NM | 168 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 7.1 seconds | 6 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 10.4 | 7.8 - 10.6 | |
|
BMW Z3 1998 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW Z3 1996. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.02 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.29 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW Z3 1998 is 2 cm shorter than the BMW Z3 1996, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW Z3 1998 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 165 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
410 litres | no data | |
|
BMW Z3 1998 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, BMW Z3 1998 has 45 litres more trunk space than the BMW Z3 1996. The BMW Z3 1996 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`590 | ~ 1`501 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW Z3 has
|
BMW Z3 has
| |