BMW X7 2018 vs Nissan Navara 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
BMW X7 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X7 engine produces 150 HP more power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 250 NM more than Nissan Navara. Thanks to more power BMW X7 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X7 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that by driving the BMW X7 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X7 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 221 mm (8.7 inches) | 600 mm (23.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Navara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.15 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| BMW X7 is 15 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 15 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 326 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2120 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X7 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan Navara, which means BMW X7 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`295 kg | 3`010 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`470 kg | 1`958 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 825 kg | 1`052 kg | |
| BMW X7 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem less than Nissan Navara. Therefore, Nissan Navara is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 63 000 | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X7 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |