BMW X7 2018 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| BMW X7 engine produces 190 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 300 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X7 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that by driving the BMW X7 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X7 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 221 mm (8.7 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X7 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi L 200 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6, BMW 6 sērija | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi ASX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The BMW X7 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.15 m | 5.31 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| BMW X7 is 15 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi L 200, 19 cm wider, while the height of BMW X7 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 326 litres | 1061 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2120 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has more luggage space. BMW X7 has 735 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X7 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means BMW X7 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`295 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 63 000 | 28 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X7 has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |