BMW X7 2018 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 4.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 339 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
BMW X7 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X7 engine produces 1 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power BMW X7 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X7 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the BMW X7 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X7 consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 105 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6, BMW 6 sērija | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X7 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.15 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| BMW X7 is 15 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 7 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X7 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 326 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2120 litres | 2030 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the BMW X7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X7 (by 90 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X7 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means BMW X7 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`295 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 61 800 | 41 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X7 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |