BMW X7 2018 vs Volvo XC90 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 620 NM | 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
BMW X7 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X7 engine produces 14 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power BMW X7 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.6 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X7 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X7 could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 221 mm (8.7 inches) | 238 mm (9.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.15 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
|
BMW X7 is larger. BMW X7 is 20 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 8 cm wider, while the height of BMW X7 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 326 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2120 litres | 1886 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, BMW X7 has 289 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC90. This could mean that the BMW X7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X7 (by 234 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X7 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means BMW X7 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`220 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 85 600 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X7 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |