BMW X7 2018 vs Volvo XC90 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 3.0 - 4.4 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 249 - 462 HP | 235 - 407 HP | |
Torque: | 450 - 760 NM | 350 - 640 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 7 seconds | 5.8 - 7.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 11.4 | 3.4 - 10.8 | |
BMW X7 petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. On average, BMW X7 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.15 m | 4.95 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 1.95 m | |
Height: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
BMW X7 is larger. BMW X7 is 20 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 5 cm wider, while the height of BMW X7 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 326 litres | 368 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2120 litres | no data | |
Volvo XC90 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW X7 has 42 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC90. This could mean that the BMW X7 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW X7 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means BMW X7 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`243 | ~ 2`750 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 85 400 | 45 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW X7 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |