BMW X6 2014 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 313 HP | 292 HP | |
| Torque: | 630 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
BMW X6 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X6 engine produces 21 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Thanks to more power BMW X6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.5 | |
|
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X6 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the BMW X6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 77 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1340 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1460 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| BMW X6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X6 2014 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW X6 2014 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| BMW X6 is 6 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 8 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X6 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 784 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1525 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the BMW X6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X6 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means BMW X6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`820 kg | 3`000 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`105 kg | 2`115 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 715 kg | 885 kg | |
| BMW X6 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 200 | 21 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X6 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |