BMW X6 2014 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
| BMW X6 engine produces 34 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Despite less power, BMW X6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 11.3 | |
|
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X6 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the BMW X6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 105 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| BMW X6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The BMW X6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X6 2014 3.0 engine: Using poor quality oil on this engine will quickly lead to soot build-up, resulting in damage to the hydrocompensators, Vanos and Valvetronic systems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
|
BMW X6 is larger, but lower. BMW X6 is 6 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW X6 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 784 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1525 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the BMW X6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X6 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`740 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 200 | 21 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X6 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |