BMW X6 2014 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 560 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
| BMW X6 engine produces 57 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Despite less power, BMW X6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.0 | |
|
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X6 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the BMW X6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 86 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1410 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1540 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| BMW X6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | 278 mm (10.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| BMW X6 is 3 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 8 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X6 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 220 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 580 litres | 780 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1525 litres | 1686 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space (by 200 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 161 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X6 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means BMW X6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`780 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`065 kg | 2`178 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 715 kg | 1`022 kg | |
| BMW X6 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 43 procentiem less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 800 | 47 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X6 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |