BMW X6 2012 vs Land Rover Discovery 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 740 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
BMW X6 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X6 engine produces 136 HP more power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Land Rover Discovery. Thanks to more power BMW X6 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X6 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that by driving the BMW X6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X6 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.89 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X6 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Land Rover Discovery, which means BMW X6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`700 | 3`240 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X6 has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |