BMW X6 2008 vs Nissan Murano 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 286 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 580 NM | 450 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
BMW X6 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X6 engine produces 96 HP more power than Nissan Murano, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Nissan Murano. Thanks to more power BMW X6 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X6 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X6 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X6 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 82 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
1190 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
760 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 27 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Pathfinder | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The BMW X6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
BMW X6 2008 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering strong performance, the ... More about BMW X6 2008 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.88 m | 4.86 m | |
Width: | 1.98 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.72 m | |
BMW X6 is larger, but slightly lower. BMW X6 is 2 cm longer than the Nissan Murano, 10 cm wider, while the height of BMW X6 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | 402 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1450 litres | no data | |
BMW X6 has more luggage capacity. BMW X6 has 168 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Murano. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW X6 is 1 metres more than that of the Nissan Murano, which means BMW X6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`710 | 2`495 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 13 600 | 8600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW X6 has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |