BMW X6 2008 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 580 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
BMW X6 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X6 engine produces 96 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 160 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Thanks to more power BMW X6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X6 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X6 could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X6 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW X6 2008 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering strong performance, the ... More about BMW X6 2008 3.0 engine Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
|
BMW X6 is larger. BMW X6 is 53 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 9 cm wider, while the height of BMW X6 is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1450 litres | no data | |
| BMW X6 has 20 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X6 is 1.5 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means BMW X6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`710 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 13 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X6 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |