BMW X6 2019 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Petrol | 4.4 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (BMW X6) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 530 HP | 339 HP | |
| Torque: | 750 NM | 740 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.3 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
BMW X6 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X6 engine produces 191 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Thanks to more power BMW X6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 8.6 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X6 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X6 could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 86 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 260'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 8 sērija | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| BMW X6 is 6 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 7 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X6 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 780 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1530 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW X6 has 200 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This could mean that the BMW X6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X6 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`975 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 72 800 | 59 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X6 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |