BMW X6 2019 vs Volvo XC90 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 400 HP | 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 760 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
BMW X6 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X6 engine produces 80 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 360 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power BMW X6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 10.8 | |
|
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X6 consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the BMW X6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 540 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| BMW X6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X7 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo S60, Volvo XC60, Volvo S90, Volvo V90 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| BMW X6 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 7 cm wider, while the height of BMW X6 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 368 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1530 litres | no data | |
|
BMW X6 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, BMW X6 has 212 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X6 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means BMW X6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`010 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 79 400 | 49 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X6 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |