BMW X6 2019 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.5 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
| BMW X6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. BMW X6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 10.5 | |
|
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X6 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the BMW X6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 104 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 990 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The BMW X6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X6 2019 3.0 engine: The B58 engine, compared to its predecessor, features a 20% increase in boost pressure, a closed-deck cylinder block design, an increased compression ratio of 11.0:1, and a slightly larger displacement of 2998 cc, up from 2979 cc, with an additional weight of 8 kg. Despite its advancements, the engine has several common ... More about BMW X6 2019 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| BMW X6 is 6 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 7 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X6 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 780 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1530 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW X6 has 200 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This could mean that the BMW X6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X6 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 76 000 | 65 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X6 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |