BMW X6 2014 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.4 | 3.0 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 - 575 HP | 248 - 550 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 - 750 NM | 450 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.2 - 6.7 seconds | 4.7 - 7.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 11.1 | 7.3 - 13.7 | |
|
BMW X6 petrol engines consumes on average 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. On average, BMW X6 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| BMW X6 is 6 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X6 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 784 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1525 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW X6 has 204 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This could mean that the BMW X6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X6 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`846 | ~ 2`765 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 33 400 | 39 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X6 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |