BMW X6 2023 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2022
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel) | 3.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 - 530 HP | 249 - 635 HP | |
| Torque: | 520 - 750 NM | 500 - 800 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.3 - 6.1 seconds | 3.8 - 8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 - 12.3 | 1.6 - 16.2 | |
|
BMW X6 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. On average, a BMW X6 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | 273 - 281 mm (10.7 - 11.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 580 litres | 647 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1530 litres | 1860 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. BMW X6 has 67 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 330 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X6 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`976 kg | ~ 3`306 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`236 kg | ~ 2`479 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 740 kg | ~ 827 kg | |
| BMW X6 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 86 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X6 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |