BMW X5 2013 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X5 engine produces 59 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 170 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X5 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X5 could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X5 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1230 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 209 mm (8.2 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6 | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X5 is 6 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW X5 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1870 litres | 1554 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, BMW X5 has 132 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the BMW X5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 316 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`740 | 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 200 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |