BMW X5 2013 vs Volvo XC90 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. BMW X5 engine produces 7 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 209 mm (8.2 inches) | 238 mm (9.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| BMW X5 2013 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car in order to ... More about BMW X5 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
|
BMW X5 is smaller. BMW X5 is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 7 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X5 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1870 litres | 1886 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, BMW X5 has 35 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 16 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 200 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |