BMW X5 2013 vs BMW X3 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
| BMW X5 engine produces 28 HP more power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 50 NM more than BMW X3. Despite the higher power, BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X5 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X5 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X5 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 1410 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 209 mm (8.2 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X3 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.66 m | |
|
BMW X5 is larger. BMW X5 is 23 cm longer than the BMW X3, 6 cm wider, while the height of BMW X5 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1870 litres | 1600 litres | |
|
BMW X5 has more luggage capacity. BMW X5 has 100 litres more trunk space than the BMW X3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 0.8 metres more than that of the BMW X3, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| BMW X3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X5 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than BMW X3, so BMW X3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 29 200 | 20 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
BMW X3 has
| |