BMW X5 2013 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2014

 
BMW X5
2013 - 2018
Mitsubishi Pajero
2014 -
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 3.0 Diesel3.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 381 HP178 HP
Torque: 740 NM261 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.3 seconds12.6 seconds
BMW X5 is more dynamic to drive.
BMW X5 engine produces 203 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 479 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 7.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.712.2
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
BMW X5 consumes 5.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the BMW X5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 825 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 85 litres88 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1260 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
1370 km on highway880 km on highway
BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Engine production duration: 16 years32 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6Used only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.89 m4.90 m
Width: 1.94 m1.88 m
Height: 1.76 m1.87 m
BMW X5 is 1 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 6 cm wider, while the height of BMW X5 is 11 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 650 litres663 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1870 litresno data
BMW X5 has 13 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero.
Turning diameter: 12.7 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`9002`810
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 29 20019 400
Pros and Cons: BMW X5 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • timing belt engine
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv