BMW X5 2013 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 740 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X5 engine produces 204 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 290 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 7.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification BMW X5 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the BMW X5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW X5 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | Used also on Toyota Hilux | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X5 2013 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW X5 2013 3.0 engine Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine: The 1GD-FTV diesel engine was introduced by Toyota in 2015 to address the shortcomings of the earlier KD series, such as high noise levels, poor performance, low fuel efficiency, environmental concerns, and ... More about Toyota Land Cruiser 2017 2.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.85 m | |
|
BMW X5 is larger, but lower. BMW X5 is 5 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 8 cm wider, while the height of BMW X5 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 621 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1870 litres | no data | |
|
BMW X5 has more luggage capacity. BMW X5 has 29 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 2`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 000 | 51 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |