BMW X5 2013 vs Porsche Cayenne 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 740 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X5 engine produces 141 HP more power than Porsche Cayenne, whereas torque is 190 NM more than Porsche Cayenne. Thanks to more power BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X5 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne, which means that by driving the BMW X5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X5 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 209 mm (8.2 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Porsche Cayenne engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 1 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X5 2013 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW X5 2013 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
| BMW X5 is 4 cm longer than the Porsche Cayenne, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW X5 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 670 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1870 litres | 1780 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, BMW X5 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Porsche Cayenne. This could mean that the BMW X5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 90 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Porsche Cayenne, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 2`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Porsche Cayenne has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X5 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Porsche Cayenne, so Porsche Cayenne quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 22 400 | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Porsche Cayenne has
| |