BMW X5 2013 vs Porsche Cayenne 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 740 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X5 engine produces 136 HP more power than Porsche Cayenne, whereas torque is 190 NM more than Porsche Cayenne. Thanks to more power BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Porsche Cayenne is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification BMW X5 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne, which means that by driving the BMW X5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW X5 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 209 mm (8.2 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
| BMW X5 is 3 cm longer than the Porsche Cayenne, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW X5 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 670 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1870 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, BMW X5 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Porsche Cayenne. This could mean that the BMW X5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 2`840 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Porsche Cayenne has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X5 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Porsche Cayenne, so Porsche Cayenne quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 27 200 | 30 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Porsche Cayenne has
| |