BMW X5 2013 vs Nissan Murano 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (BMW X5) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan Murano) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 740 NM | 325 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X5 engine produces 132 HP more power than Nissan Murano, whereas torque is 415 NM more than Nissan Murano. Thanks to more power BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 10.2 | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X5 consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano, which means that by driving the BMW X5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The BMW X5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X5 2013 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW X5 2013 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
| BMW X5 is 1 cm shorter than the Nissan Murano, 2 cm wider, while the height of BMW X5 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 909 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1870 litres | 1897 litres | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage space. BMW X5 has 259 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Murano. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Murano (by 27 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 600 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |