BMW X5 2013 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 292 HP | |
| Torque: | 740 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X5 engine produces 89 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Thanks to more power BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.5 | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X5 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the BMW X5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 77 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| BMW X5 is 4 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 14 cm narrower, while the height of BMW X5 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 784 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1870 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW X5 has 134 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This could mean that the BMW X5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 600 | 39 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |