BMW X5 2013 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 740 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X5 engine produces 75 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Thanks to more power BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.0 | |
| BMW X5 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the BMW X5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 86 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 209 mm (8.2 inches) | 278 mm (10.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW X5 2013 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW X5 2013 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| BMW X5 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 220 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 650 litres | 780 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1870 litres | 1686 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space (by 130 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 184 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`900 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`190 kg | 2`178 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 710 kg | 1`022 kg | |
| BMW X5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 44 procentiem less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 47 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |