BMW X5 2013 vs Land Rover Discovery 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 740 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X5 engine produces 136 HP more power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Land Rover Discovery. Thanks to more power BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X5 consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that by driving the BMW X5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X5 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Discovery engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW X5 2013 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW X5 2013 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.89 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1870 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Discovery, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 3`240 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |