BMW X5 2013 vs Fiat Freemont 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 740 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X5 engine produces 211 HP more power than Fiat Freemont, whereas torque is 390 NM more than Fiat Freemont. Thanks to more power BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Freemont is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification BMW X5 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Freemont, which means that by driving the BMW X5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW X5 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Freemont. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 209 mm (8.2 inches) | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
| BMW X5 and Fiat Freemont are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 145 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 650 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1870 litres | 1461 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 409 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Fiat Freemont, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 2`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 400 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Fiat Freemont has
| |