BMW X5 2013 vs Dodge Journey 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (BMW X5) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Dodge Journey) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 740 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| BMW X5 engine produces 208 HP more power than Dodge Journey, whereas torque is 515 NM more than Dodge Journey. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 11.2 | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X5 consumes 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Journey, which means that by driving the BMW X5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 675 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 77 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
BMW X5 has 4x4: xDrive, based on an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch in the front-wheel drive (60% of the traction goes to the rear axle) | |||
| Ground clearance: | 209 mm (8.2 inches) | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Journey engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring, Jeep Compass | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Journey might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The BMW X5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X5 2013 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW X5 2013 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
| BMW X5 and Dodge Journey are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1870 litres | 1915 litres | |
| BMW X5 has 350 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Journey. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Journey (by 45 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 1 metres more than that of the Dodge Journey, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`900 kg | 2`381 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`190 kg | 1`735 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 710 kg | 646 kg | |
| BMW X5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than Dodge Journey. Therefore, BMW X5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Dodge Journey has
| |