BMW X5 2013 vs BMW X5 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 740 NM | 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 2013 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X5 2013 engine produces 136 HP more power than BMW X5 2010, whereas torque is 200 NM more than BMW X5 2010. Thanks to more power BMW X5 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X5 2010 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification BMW X5 2013 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5 2010, which means that by driving the BMW X5 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW X5 2013 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 209 mm (8.2 inches) | 222 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X5 2010 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X5 2010 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 2010 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X5 2013 is 3 cm longer than the BMW X5 2010, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW X5 2013 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1870 litres | 1750 litres | |
|
BMW X5 2013 has more luggage capacity. BMW X5 2013 has 30 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5 2010. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 2013 (by 120 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 2013 is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW X5 2010. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 2`755 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 29 200 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
BMW X5 has
| |