BMW X5 2010 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (BMW X5) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 408 HP | 248 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.5 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X5 engine produces 160 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 7.3 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X5 consumes 5.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X5 could require 780 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 77 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6, BMW 6 sērija | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| BMW X5 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 620 litres | 784 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1750 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. BMW X5 has 164 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`870 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 39 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |