BMW X5 2010 vs BMW X3 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X5 engine produces 48 HP more power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 90 NM more than BMW X3. Thanks to more power BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.4 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X5 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X5 could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X5 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 222 mm (8.7 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X5 2010 3.0 engine: Using poor quality oil on this engine will quickly lead to soot build-up, resulting in damage to the hydrocompensators, Vanos and Valvetronic systems. BMW X3 2010 3.0 engine: The BMW N52 engine was the first water-cooled engine to feature a composite cylinder block made from a magnesium and aluminum alloy. It was included in Ward’s AutoWorld’s list of the top 10 engines in 2006 and 2007. While it offers many advantages, the ... More about BMW X3 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.66 m | |
|
BMW X5 is larger. BMW X5 is 21 cm longer than the BMW X3, 5 cm wider, while the height of BMW X5 is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 620 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1750 litres | 1600 litres | |
|
BMW X5 has more luggage capacity. BMW X5 has 70 litres more trunk space than the BMW X3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 150 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 1.1 metres more than that of the BMW X3, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`305 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| BMW X3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X5 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than BMW X3, so BMW X3 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
BMW X3 has
| |