BMW X5 2010 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 540 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
| BMW X5 engine produces 2 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Despite less power, BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification BMW X5 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the BMW X5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW X5 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 222 mm (8.7 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X5 is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 620 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1750 litres | 1554 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, BMW X5 has 162 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the BMW X5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 196 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`755 | 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 25 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |