BMW X5 2010 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 248 HP | |
| Torque: | 540 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
| BMW X5 engine produces 3 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.3 | |
| BMW X5 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X5 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 77 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X5 2010 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW X5 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| BMW X5 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 620 litres | 784 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1750 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. BMW X5 has 164 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`755 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 37 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |