BMW X5 2010 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 292 HP | |
| Torque: | 540 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. BMW X5 engine produces 47 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.5 | |
| BMW X5 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the BMW X5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 77 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| BMW X5 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 620 litres | 784 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1750 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. BMW X5 has 164 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`755 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 39 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |