BMW X5 2010 vs Fiat Freemont 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 540 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X5 engine produces 75 HP more power than Fiat Freemont, whereas torque is 190 NM more than Fiat Freemont. Thanks to more power BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Freemont is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X5 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Freemont, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X5 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X5 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Freemont. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 222 mm (8.7 inches) | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| BMW X5 2010 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW X5 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.69 m | |
| BMW X5 is 3 cm shorter than the Fiat Freemont, 5 cm wider, while the height of BMW X5 is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 620 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 145 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 620 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1750 litres | 1461 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 289 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Fiat Freemont, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`755 kg | 2`510 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`075 kg | 2`089 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 680 kg | 421 kg | |
| BMW X5 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 38 procentiem more than Fiat Freemont. Therefore, BMW X5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Fiat Freemont has
| |