BMW X5 2004 vs BMW X5 2002

 
BMW X5
2004 - 2007
BMW X5
2002 - 2003
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.8 Petrol4.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 360 HP347 HP
Torque: 490 NM480 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.1 seconds6.5 seconds
BMW X5 2004 is more dynamic to drive.
BMW X5 2004 engine produces 13 HP more power than BMW X5 2002, whereas torque is 10 NM more than BMW X5 2002. Thanks to more power BMW X5 2004 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 14.015.0
The BMW X5 2004 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
BMW X5 2004 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5 2002, which means that by driving the BMW X5 2004 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 93 litres93 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
930 km on highway840 km on highway
BMW X5 2004 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 187 mm (7.4 inches)187 mm (7.4 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 460'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 9 years28 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 6 sērijaUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.67 m
Width: 1.92 m1.92 m
Height: 1.71 m1.71 m
Both cars are similar in size. BMW X5 2004 and BMW X5 2002 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 465 litres465 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1550 litres1550 litres
Turning diameter: 12 meters12 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`7002`650
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 54003800
Rating in user reviews: 8.5/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: BMW X5 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
BMW X5 has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv