BMW X5 2003 vs BMW X5 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 320 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 2003 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X5 2003 engine produces 34 HP more power than BMW X5 2000, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power BMW X5 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 14.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.7 l/100km | 14.9 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X5 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X5 2003 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5 2000, which means that by driving the BMW X5 2003 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X5 2003 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5 2000. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X5 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 187 mm (7.4 inches) | 187 mm (7.4 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 6 sērija | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, Land Rover Range Rover | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X5 2003 and BMW X5 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1550 litres | 1550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`700 | 2`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 3800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
BMW X5 has
| |