BMW X5 2003 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005

 
BMW X5
2003 - 2007
Jeep Grand Cherokee
2005 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel3.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 218 HP218 HP
Torque: 500 NM510 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.8 seconds9 seconds
BMW X5 and Jeep Grand Cherokee have the same engine power, but BMW X5 torque is 10 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.410.2
Real fuel consumption: 10.5 l/100km11.5 l/100km
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW X5 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the BMW X5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X5 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Fuel tank capacity: 93 litres78 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway900 km on highway
880 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X5 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 3 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X3Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect.
BMW X5 2003 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering ...  More about BMW X5 2003 3.0 engine 

Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ...  More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.75 m
Width: 1.87 m1.87 m
Height: 1.72 m1.74 m
Both cars are similar in size. BMW X5 is 8 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW X5 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 465 litres978 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1550 litres1909 litres
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space.
BMW X5 has 513 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 359 litres).
Turning diameter: 12 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`6952`750
Safety:
Quality:
below average

average
Jeep Grand Cherokee has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW X5 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee, so Jeep Grand Cherokee quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 50005200
Pros and Cons: BMW X5 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • higher safety
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv