BMW X5 2003 vs Hyundai Terracan 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 333 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X5 engine produces 68 HP more power than Hyundai Terracan, whereas torque is 167 NM more than Hyundai Terracan. Thanks to more power BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification BMW X5 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X5 could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW X5 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X3 | Used also on Kia Carnival | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW X5 2003 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering ... More about BMW X5 2003 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.80 m | |
| BMW X5 is 4 cm shorter than the Hyundai Terracan, 1 cm wider, while the height of BMW X5 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 1170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1550 litres | 1955 litres | |
|
Hyundai Terracan has more luggage space. BMW X5 has 705 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Terracan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Terracan (by 405 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Hyundai Terracan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`695 | 2`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Hyundai Terracan has
| |