BMW X5 2002 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 347 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 425 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is more dynamic to drive. BMW X5 engine produces 89 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power BMW X5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.0 | 16.5 | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW X5 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the BMW X5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 600 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 187 mm (7.4 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.81 m | |
|
BMW X5 is larger, but lower. BMW X5 is 6 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm wider, while the height of BMW X5 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1550 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW X5 has 639 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the BMW X5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 497 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW X5 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means BMW X5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`650 | 2`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X5 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee, so Jeep Grand Cherokee quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |