BMW X5 2000 vs BMW X5 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 HP | 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 7 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 2003 is a more dynamic driving. BMW X5 2000 engine produces 34 HP less power than BMW X5 2003, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, BMW X5 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.0 | 13.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.9 l/100km | 13.7 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X5 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW X5 2000 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW X5 2000 could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW X5 2000 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5 2003. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X5 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 187 mm (7.4 inches) | 187 mm (7.4 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, Land Rover Range Rover | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 6 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW X5 2003 4.4 engine: The main problems with the N62 engine are related to malfunctions in the Valvetronic and VANOS systems. Fluctuating idle is usually caused by ignition coil failure, air leaks, MAF sensor problems or problems ... More about BMW X5 2003 4.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW X5 2000 and BMW X5 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 465 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1550 litres | 1550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`650 | 2`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 5400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW X5 has
|
BMW X5 has
| |